Extracted from ( the article R413-15) of the traffic rules.
In this text it(he) is noted : seizure and seizure are of right ; as a rule, the fact that such a device is connected at the time of the control, or the abnormal conditions of the transport, shall bring the proof of the malpractice. If it is about a detector antiradar without the other object !....
Answer of our lawyer : the DDR LT 900 OR LT950 are not concerned by this article due to the function(office) multi-services has the other functions(offices) and due to the ratification IT (The device has the mark(brand) of compulsory ratification CEMand can be installed(settled) with a some garage in 1 at 2 o'clock).Noted that for the other devices of this range, they can control a broadcast(emission,issue) Laser or Hyperfrequency of your burglar alarm, and this for your safety(security) when you left your house or your professional premises, it is a question of applying law not to connect not of PV. By these functions(offices), the unique(only) proof that it is about a detector of radar is not lawful! So good road...
|
